Thursday, August 17, 2017

LeDomduVin: Classified Growths, 2nd Wine and 2nd Label

Classified Growths, 2nd Wine, and 2nd Label

Sometimes, people who are not knowledgeable about French wines, and more especially Bordeaux and its classification, seem to mistake 2nd growth with the 2nd wine or 2nd label, confusing them or misunderstanding the concept of them. 

It happened with one of my colleagues at work who enjoys wine from time to time but has little knowledge about the history and/or classification of Bordeaux wines. Thus, I answered his question as simply as possible, inspiring me to write this post for anyone interested in learning about the differences.

Let's try to define them to have a clearer idea of what they are...

Classified Growths

The term "Classified Growths" (or "Crus Classés" in French) usually refers to Bordeaux Wines. It basically represents the listed Chateaux included in the original "1855 Bordeaux Classification," as well as the Chateaux resulting from property splits due to new ownership or family matters.

Although the list only stated them as "Crus" (Premiers Crus, Deuxième Crus, etc...), the word "Grand" ("Great") was added to their title to become "Grand Cru" (see labels below for examples)

For the Reds:
  • 56 Châteaux from the "Haut-Médoc"
    • 4     Premiers Grands Crus Classés (1st Growths)
    • 12   Seconds Grands Crus Classés (2nd Growths) (including Mouton *)
    • 14   Troisièmes Grands Crus Classés (3rd Growths)
    • 10   Quatrièmes Grands Crus Classés (4th Growths)
    • 17   Cinquièmes Grands Crus Classés (5th Growths) (+ Cantemerle added later **)
  • 1 Château from the "Graves" 
    • 1     Premier Grand Cru Classé (Haut Brion)
For the Whites (Sweet):
  • 21 Châteaux from the "Sauternes-Barsac" region
    • 1    Premier Cru Supérieur
    • 9    Premiers Crus
    • 11  Second Crus
FYI: Despite Château Lafite-Rothschild, 3 of the original 4 "First Classified Growths" bear the name "Premier Grand Cru Classé" on their label. Some 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th growths also bear "Grand Cru Classé en 1855" on their label.

Châteaux Margaux - Latour - Haut Brion Collage - ©LeDomduVin

NB: 2 more Classifications were established later on for the "Graves" and "Saint-Emilion" regions, with Châteaux also bearing on their labels the name of "Classified Growth" or "Great Classified Growth" ("Cru Classé" or "Grand Cru Classé" in French) 
  • Graves - Pessac-Léognan: The First Classification was established in 1953 but officialized in 1959 (read the press release details about this classification here)
  • Saint-Emilion: First Classification in 1955, updated in 1969, then 1986, 1996 and 2006 declared invalid (back to the classification of 1996 between 2006 and 2009), the latest Classification dates from 2012. (Read the press release details of this latest classification here)
You can also check a full listing of the wines for these 3 classifications here, and you will surely notice the usual recurring mistakes made in all 1855 Bordeaux Classification I could find on the internet, which are:

(*)  Château Mouton-Rothschild was a 2nd Growth in 1855 and was only elevated to the rank of 1st Growth in 1973, yet most listings I found include it in the 1st Growth of 1855, which is wrong and makes me wonder why people do not check prior publishing such incorrect lists on the internet.

(**) Château Cantemerle was apparently not listed on the 1855 list. It appears that it was added to the Classification List the year after in 1856. Was it forgotten or omitted from the original list and then added later? Who knows, really? We know that some writings on the subject are quite controversial and/or contradictory on whether Cantemerle was part of the original 1855 Classification list or not.

However, suppose one looks at the original classification list (see the picture below at the end of the list of the "Cinquièmes Crus"). In that case, it is clear that Cantemerle was added after the completion of the list. The font, size, and handwriting style are quite different from the ones of the original list. Therefore, for sure it was added after. Whether it was in 1855 or 1856 will be difficult to know now. Another controversial fact about Cantemerle from these writings is that, despite proofs of its existence dating back to the 12th Century, it seems that Chateau Cantemerle has never appeared on Bordeaux Wine Region maps before 1856.... go figure.... maybe the best would be to ask the Chateau directly...

I wrote a little about the 1855 Bordeaux Classification further below in this post to complement this "Classified Growths" chapter.

2nd Wine (or 3rd wine)

A 2nd wine is a wine also produced at the Chateau and from the same appellation (AOC), but usually can either come from:
  1. From younger vineyards that are not used for the Grand Vin
  2. Or from vineyards that do not produce grapes of high quality enough to be included in the production of the "Grand Vin" due to various factors (Terroir: soils, subsoils, inclination, exposition, orientation, climate, environment, etc...). 
The best parcels are usually reserved for producing the "Grand Vin," and lesser or younger parcels to make the 2nd or even 3rd wine.

For example, Chateau Latour produces 3 wines at the Chateau, all from the Pauillac Appellation Contrôlée.
  1. Château Latour - 1st Wine or "Grand Vin"
  2. Les Forts de Latour - 2nd Wine
  3. Pauillac (also known as "Le Pauillac de Château Latour") - 3rd Wine

Châteaux Latour - Les Forts de LaTour - Pauillac Collage - ©LeDomduVin

2nd Label (or 3rd Label)

Often confused with or referred to as a "second wine," a" second label" is, in my opinion and by definition, a totally different wine (than a "second wine").

A "2nd label" is usually also produced at the Chateau but can either come from:
  1. From a specific vineyard, parcel, or cru of the same appellation (AOC)  
  2. From vineyards outside the appellation of the "Grand Vin" within a more generic appellation
  3. From declassified wines not good enough to pass the quality for the upper-rank
  4. From grapes not authorized in the specific appellation of the Grand Vin but that can still be used for more generic appellation wines
  5. From a vineyard reattached to the Chateau but located nearby or in a neighboring appellation. 

For example, Chateau Mouton-Rothschild produces three wines at the Chateau, two under the Pauillac Appellation and one under the Bordeaux Appellation, which, in my opinion, can be considered a second label.
  1. Château Mouton-Rothschild - Pauillac - First Wine or "Grand Vin"
  2. Le Petit Mouton - Pauillac - 2nd Wine
  3. Mouton Cadet—Bordeaux—2nd Label or 3rd Label (I'll let you decide, depending on your perspective) is produced from grapes sourced in Pauillac and neighboring appellations. 

Châteaux Mouton-Rothschild - Le Petit Mouton - Mouton Cadet Collage - ©LeDomduVin

Et Voilà! That is the simplest way to explain the differences between a 2nd growth and a 2nd wine or 2nd label. I hope it helped you to clarify and answer your questions. Leave me a comment in the comments box at the end of this post if you have any on the subject, and let's discuss it :-) 

And now, to complement the Classified Growths Chapter above, let's talk about the 1855 Bordeaux Classification in Photos. Visuals often speak louder than words, and too many long articles have already been written on the subject. 

1855 Bordeaux Classification

1855 Bordeaux Classification 
(Courtesy of Cadman Fine Wines)

The 1855 Bordeaux Classification

In 1855, Emperor Napoleon III requested that wine Brokers, Negociants, and/or Merchants create a Classification system of the best Bordeaux wines to be displayed for visitors at the "Exposition Universelle de Paris."

They first established a list of the best Chateaux in Bordeaux based on their reputation and notoriety, then ranked them by adding the Chateau's trading prices, which, at the time, was a reflection of their quality (I said "at the time" because, nowadays, if the Classification had to be redone, people would realize that high price is not always reflecting the quality of the wine and the ranking of these same wines will definitely not be the same.... but that will be the subject of another post). 

Bordeaux Map 1952 - Dpt. de la Gironde
(Courtesy of

At the time, only the wines from the Left Bank (left of the Garonne River and Gironde Estuary) were ranked and divided into 2 main categories:
  1. The Reds of the Gironde (Reds of the Haut-Medoc region mostly + Haut Brion from the Graves region)
  2. The Whites of the Gironde (Whites of the Sauternes-Barsac region)

Bordeaux Left Bank Map
(Courtesy of

The wines were ranked and sorted by order of importance, notoriety, and price.

1855 Bordeaux Classification
Original handwritten letter preceding the list of classified growths 
(courtesy of here)

Most Reds came from the Médoc region except for Château Haut-Brion from Graves.
The list was divided into five categories, from the First to the Fifth growths (or "Crus" in French).

1855 Bordeaux Classification red wines 1st and 2nd Growths
(Courtesy of

1855 Bordeaux Classification red wines 3rd and 4th Growths 
(Courtesy of

1855 Bordeaux Classification red wines 5th Growths 
(Courtesy of

1855 Bordeaux Classification red wines 5th Growths
(courtesy of click here)

As for the white wines, the classification concerned only the sweet wine of Sauternes and Barsac, which were ranked in 3 categories: Superior First Growth, First Growths, and Second Growths.

The classification of French wineries, estates, and vineyards does not solely stop at Bordeaux. Other French Regions, like Burgundy and Alsace, also possess their own "Grand Crus" and "Premiers Crus."

Cheers! Santé!


And drink good wines. Life is too short to drink bad wines!
And do me a favor, stop thinking that good wines are always expensive.
There plenty of great wines at very affordable prices out there, just look for them, they exist...!?!

LeDomduVin a.k.a Dominique Noël

@ledomduvin #ledomduvin #wine #vin #vino #wine #bordeaux #grandcru #grandscrus #history #secondwine #secondlabel #classifiedgrowths #1855classification

Unless stated otherwise, all rights reserved ©LeDomduVin 2017, on all the contents above including, but not limited to, photos, pictures, drawings, illustrations, collages, visuals, maps, memes, posts, texts, writings, quotes, notes, tasting notes, descriptions, wine descriptions, definitions, recipes, graphs, tables, and even music and video (when and where applicable).


  1. Thank you for taking the time to publish this information very useful! local classified website

    1. Thank you Mark, I'm glad you found my post useful. That is exactly what is keeping me going on writing more of them.

  2. I was very pleased to find this site.I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post. Custom Patches

    1. Thank you Linda, glad you enjoyed reading it and will try to write more posts like this one. It is people like you who inspire me to continue writing.

  3. This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing blog that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. anuncios clasificados

    1. Thank You Muhammad, glad you find my post to be a great resource, much appreciated. It is for free as I believe education in general should be free and accessible to everyone. Educated people should make for a better world.... hopefully...

  4. i never know the use of adobe shadow until i saw this post. thank you for this! this is very helpful. Classified site in Las Vegas etc.

  5. This particular is usually apparently essential and moreover outstanding truth along with for sure fair-minded and moreover admittedly useful My business is looking to find in advance designed for this specific useful stuffs… Free Classified Ads In Nigeria

  6. It's really nice and meanful. it's really cool blog. Linking is very useful have really helped lots of people who visit blog and provide them usefull information. Wineshop

  7. Positive site, where did u come up with the information on this posting?I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style. Thanks a million and please keep up the effective work. backpage replacement

  8. Im no expert, but I believe you just made an excellent point. You certainly fully understand what youre speaking about, and I can truly get behind that. backpage classified

  9. Thanks for your information, it was really very helpful: backpage classified

  10. Your website is really cool and this is a great inspiring article. Thank you so much. free instagram likes instantly

  11. Superb information article. Thank you . The travelers need to fill up the Kenya visa application form to get the Kenya visa. Therefor, if the apply online, will get the fastest visa services with 24 hours customer support and also can apply for kenya transit visa.

  12. I really liked your blog. Really looking forward to reading more. keep writing. India evisa requirments for USA, US citizens are eligible to apply for India eVisa.You can read all requirements for USA citizens online India e visa portal. And Within 5 to 10 minutes you can apply for your Indian eVisa from the USA.

  13. Thank you . Your articles are very informative . Keep writing. The Government of Ukraine grants the e-visa online. And now you can easily know about the facts related to the Ukraine visa fees?. The Ukraine visa fee is dependent on your nationality and type of e-visa which one you choose.

  14. Great job! I really like your work. US citizens are eligible to apply for the Indian tourist visa. The process of Indian tourist visa for US citizens is fully online.

  15. This blog post really hits home! It's like the author reached into my mind and pulled out all the thoughts and emotions I've been grappling with. Reading this feels like sitting down with a trusted friend who just "gets it." I'm grateful for the reminder that I'm not alone in this journey, that others are navigating similar waters. Thank you for sharing your insights; they've truly touched my heart and left me feeling understood in a way I haven't felt in a long time.

  16. This post speaks volumes to me, capturing the essence of the human experience with such clarity and depth. It's like the author has taken a peek inside my mind and articulated my thoughts and feelings in a way that I couldn't quite express myself. Reading this feels like coming home to a familiar place, where I'm understood and accepted just as I am. Thank you for sharing your wisdom and insights; they've left an indelible mark on my soul, reminding me of the beauty and complexity of the human spirit.

  17. Such a refreshing blog post! Your writing is so engaging, and your insights are truly enlightening. I found myself agreeing with every point you raised. It's obvious you've put a lot of effort into this piece, and it really shows. Looking forward to reading more from you. Keep up the great work!

  18. This post is a breath of fresh air in a sea of content. The author's authenticity and vulnerability shine through, making it easy to connect with their message on a deep level. It's refreshing to encounter such genuine reflections on life and self-awareness. Reading this feels like a warm embrace, encouraging me to embrace my own journey with compassion and curiosity. Thank you for sharing your wisdom and insights with the world.

  19. Your insights are deeply resonant, offering a fresh perspective that's truly engaging. Your authenticity shines through, making this post a standout amidst the noise. It eloquently navigates life's intricacies, providing comfort and motivation. Thank you for sharing your wisdom and underscoring the significance of empathy and introspection. Your contribution is both enlightening and enriching.